When a tool offers to work for hours, ask what it must deliver at the end. A repository, report or demonstration can look complete while leaving important questions unanswered. More autonomy calls for a clear way to accept or reject the work.
Google describes Antigravity as an development platform. This article examines its documented approach using official sources checked on September 7, 2026. We have not run our own Antigravity trial or measured time savings on a LetBrand project.
Start small before attempting a migration
Choose a copy of a simple project. A first task could add a filter to an existing table while preserving its sorting and empty state. Watch the working cycle: what the agent asks, changes, runs and presents for review.
Specify what falls outside the request too. Adding a filter does not require redesigning the entire page. A broader result can be less useful if it creates unrelated changes to inspect.
Open the files and reproduce the behavior. Keep the initial state and final diff. This does not require a large benchmark. It requires a result you can recognize as finished.
What Teamwork adds
The Teamwork documentation describes coordinated agents for extensive tasks. Work begins by defining objectives and acceptance criteria, followed by organized execution and verification.
The practical distinction is the problem’s scope. A bounded task may need a short edit-and-check cycle. A migration across components also needs dependency management: who changes an interface, who updates its consumers and how the combined result is checked.
Write those dependencies down before involving a team of agents. If you cannot explain which parts can proceed independently, adding agents may create more integration work. This is methodological advice, not a measurement of Teamwork’s performance.
Read the announcements within their limits
’s August 27 update describes research and engineering applications. These are provider-reported examples, not evidence that every project will achieve comparable results.
For a published case, ask what was checked, against which reference and under what conditions. Completing a particular demonstration does not establish the cost of maintaining your application or the review time you will need.
Availability changes as well. The current documentation and recent announcement place Teamwork on paid plans, while earlier materials restricted it to Ultra. Check actual account access before planning work around that feature. We do not assume a universal quota or a regional price here.
What to inspect in the first assignment
Keep a short acceptance list: the feature satisfies the request, unrelated changes are explained, you can run the checks, sample data contains no private information, and you know how to restore the starting point.
Ask the deliverable to distinguish executed tests, outstanding checks and decisions the agent made independently. A statement that everything works is insufficient when you cannot locate the supporting evidence.
For an interface, inspect it in the browser. For a refactor, compare behavior before and after. For a report, open the important sources. The tool can help produce evidence, but the evidence you need depends on the assignment.
When to extend the evaluation
I would continue if the first task leaves understandable changes that are easy to verify. Expand the scope gradually while preserving acceptance criteria. If missing project information is the main obstacle, supply that information before blaming the model.
If you are considering other coding environments, apply the criteria in our Claude Code and Codex comparison.
Coordinating agents does not imply that they improve themselves. We explain the distinction in our guide to recursive self-improvement.
Our guide to agent skills separates reusable instructions from tools. If you want to define a bounded evaluation for your team, tell us about the project.
